Announcing o11's backing from Y Combinator.
Nonprofits: AI Fundraising Decks in Google Slides
Every nonprofit development officer knows the cycle. A grant deadline appears on the calendar, and suddenly the entire team is scrambling to pull program data from spreadsheets, dig up outcome metrics from last quarter, and stitch it all into a presentation that somehow needs to feel both data-driven and emotionally compelling. Then a major donor requests an update deck by Friday. Then the board wants an annual report presentation for next week.
The math is brutal. A mid-sized nonprofit might produce 30 to 50 fundraising presentations a year across foundation proposals, donor stewardship updates, capital campaign pitches, and board reports. Each one requires pulling data from multiple sources, formatting it to match the organization’s brand, and telling a story that connects dollars to impact. Most development teams have one or two people doing this work, and they are already managing donor relationships, writing narrative proposals, and planning events.
The result is predictable: recycled decks with outdated numbers, inconsistent formatting across presentations, and hours spent on layout instead of relationship building. For organizations where every dollar matters, spending staff time on manual slide construction is a cost that compounds quietly.
Grant Proposal Presentations from Program Data
Foundation program officers review dozens of proposals each cycle. The decks that stand out are the ones that connect a clear need to measurable outcomes with a realistic budget. Building that narrative from raw program data is where most teams lose time.
o11 For Google Slides connects directly to the Google Sheets where your program data already lives. Instead of copying numbers into slides manually and hoping nothing breaks when a figure updates, you describe what the presentation needs to accomplish.
“Build a 12-slide grant proposal deck for the Meyer Foundation using our program outcomes data in the ‘FY2025 Impact Metrics’ Sheet. Include a logic model slide, a 3-year budget summary, and a slide showing participant outcomes by cohort. Use our organization’s slide template.”
o11 pulls the data, structures it into the narrative arc that program officers expect, and formats everything within your existing slide masters. When your finance team updates the budget numbers in Sheets the night before submission, your deck reflects those changes without a rebuild.
“Add a comparison slide showing our cost-per-participant against the national average for youth development programs. Pull our numbers from column G in the outcomes Sheet.”
This is particularly useful for organizations applying to multiple foundations with similar but not identical requirements. You can generate a base deck and then adjust the emphasis for each funder’s priorities without starting from scratch each time.
Donor Update Decks Pulling Impact Metrics from Sheets
Major donors do not want a thank-you email with a PDF attachment. They want to see what their money did. But creating personalized impact reports for 15 or 20 major donors every quarter is a staffing problem that most nonprofits solve by sending the same generic update to everyone.
o11 changes the equation. Because it reads directly from your Google Sheets, you can generate donor-specific update decks that pull the metrics relevant to each donor’s giving area.
“Create a Q4 donor update deck for the Patterson Family Fund. They fund our literacy program. Pull reading-level improvement data from the ‘Literacy Outcomes’ Sheet, include enrollment numbers from ‘Program Roster,’ and add a slide showing how their $75,000 gift was allocated across the three budget categories in row 14.”
The deck arrives formatted in your brand, with charts that match your organization’s style, and data that is accurate to the source. No manual chart building. No copy-paste errors that show a donor the wrong program’s numbers.
“Generate a one-slide impact snapshot for each of our top 10 donors based on the ‘Major Gifts Tracker’ Sheet. Match each donor to their designated program area and pull the relevant outcome metrics.”
For development directors, this turns quarterly stewardship from a two-week project into an afternoon task. The time saved goes back into the relationship work that actually drives retention and upgrades.
Annual Report Presentations with Year-over-Year Comparisons
Annual reports are the nonprofit equivalent of earnings calls. The board, donors, staff, and community partners all want to see the trajectory: Are we growing? Are programs working? Is the organization financially healthy?
Building a presentation that answers these questions means pulling data across fiscal years and presenting it in a way that tells a coherent story. Most teams spend weeks on this, manually building comparison charts and double-checking that last year’s numbers match what was reported 12 months ago.
“Build our FY2025 annual report presentation. Pull revenue and expense data from the ‘Financial Summary’ Sheet, program outcome trends from ‘Multi-Year Outcomes,’ and headcount from ‘Staff Directory.’ Include year-over-year comparison charts for the last three fiscal years. Use our annual report slide template.”
o11 handles the cross-referencing automatically. It builds trendline charts from your multi-year data, formats financial summaries that match nonprofit reporting standards, and maintains consistency between the numbers in your presentation and the numbers in your spreadsheets.
“Add a slide comparing our program growth rate to our fundraising growth rate over the last 4 years. Flag any year where expenses grew faster than revenue.”
This kind of analysis slide would take a staff member an hour to build manually. With o11, the data is already connected. The insight surfaces in seconds.
Before and After: The Development Team’s Week
Before o11: A grant deadline triggers a scramble. The program manager exports data to CSV, emails it to the development associate, who manually enters it into a slide template that may or may not be the current version. Charts are built by hand in Slides. The development director reviews, finds three data errors, and the cycle restarts. Total time from kickoff to submission-ready deck: 8 to 12 hours spread across three people.
After o11: The development director opens Google Slides, prompts o11 with the grant requirements and points it to the relevant Sheets. A complete draft appears in minutes, formatted to the organization’s template, with live data connections. The director reviews for narrative accuracy, makes a few prompt-based adjustments, and the deck is ready. Total time: 90 minutes, one person.
The difference is not just speed. It is accuracy. When data flows directly from source spreadsheets into slides, the errors that come from manual transcription disappear. For organizations reporting to funders who will verify numbers, that reliability matters.
Why o11 Instead of a Generic AI Tool
Generic AI presentation tools can generate slides from a text prompt. But nonprofit fundraising decks are not generic presentations. They require specific data from specific spreadsheets, formatted according to specific funder expectations, within specific brand guidelines.
ChatGPT or Gemini can write you a nice paragraph about youth development outcomes. Neither can pull your actual participant data from Google Sheets, format it into a logic model slide, and place it in your organization’s template with the correct fonts and colors. That is the gap between a text generator and a workspace tool.
o11 also respects the data relationships that matter in nonprofit reporting. When you reference “cost per participant” in a grant proposal, o11 calculates it from your actual budget and enrollment data rather than generating a plausible-sounding number. For organizations whose credibility depends on accurate reporting, this distinction is not minor.
Development teams that adopt o11 consistently report that the biggest impact is not the time saved on any single deck. It is the ability to say yes to more funding opportunities because the bottleneck of presentation creation no longer limits how many proposals they can submit in a cycle.
