Announcing o11's backing from Y Combinator.
Consultants: Automate Client Deliverables in Google Docs
Management consulting runs on deliverables. Every engagement produces a stack of documents: diagnostic reports, strategy recommendations, implementation roadmaps, progress updates, final readouts. These are not casual memos. They are structured, evidence-based documents that clients pay significant fees to receive, and they need to look, read, and reason like the work of a top-tier firm.
The problem is that producing these deliverables takes a disproportionate amount of time relative to the thinking behind them. A consultant might spend two days conducting interviews and analyzing data, arriving at a clear set of findings and recommendations. Then they spend another two days writing it up: structuring the narrative, formatting sections, ensuring the executive summary captures the right level of detail, weaving in data points, and making the document presentable enough to put in front of a C-suite audience.
This is the structural inefficiency of consulting. The intellectual work, the diagnosis, the pattern recognition, the strategic judgment, gets compressed into a fraction of the engagement timeline. The rest is production work: typing, formatting, restructuring, and editing documents that follow patterns the consultant has used dozens of times before. Junior consultants spend their evenings reformatting deliverables. Managers spend their mornings rewriting executive summaries. Partners review documents that are structurally fine but took three times longer than necessary to produce.
Client Diagnostic Reports from Interview Notes
The diagnostic phase of a consulting engagement typically generates 10 to 30 pages of interview notes, workshop outputs, and observational findings. Turning this raw material into a structured diagnostic report is one of the most time-consuming tasks in consulting, and one of the most formulaic. The structure is nearly always the same: executive summary, methodology, key findings by theme, supporting evidence, and preliminary recommendations.
o11 For Google Docs can transform your raw inputs into a structured first draft that follows professional consulting conventions.
“Using the interview notes in this document, create a client diagnostic report with the following sections: Executive Summary, Methodology, Key Findings grouped by theme, and Preliminary Recommendations. Identify the 3-5 strongest themes across all interviews and support each with direct quotes from the notes.”
“Write an executive summary for this diagnostic report. It should be no more than 300 words, state the engagement objective, summarize the top 3 findings, and preview the recommended next steps. Write it for a CEO audience.”
o11 reads your interview notes, identifies recurring themes and patterns, and produces a structured report in your Google Doc. It does not generate generic consulting language. It works from your actual notes, pulling specific observations and quotes into the appropriate sections. The output is a working first draft that a consultant can refine and add judgment to, not a blank-page starting point.
The time savings compound across the engagement. When you have 15 stakeholder interviews to synthesize, the difference between starting from your notes versus starting from a structured draft is easily a full day of work.
Strategy Recommendation Documents from Analysis Frameworks
After the diagnostic phase, consultants develop strategic recommendations. These documents are more complex: they need to present the analytical framework used, walk through the logic of each option evaluated, explain the recommended path, and anticipate objections. The structure varies by firm, but the building blocks are consistent: situation overview, strategic options, evaluation criteria, recommended approach, implementation considerations, and risk factors.
Most consultants have a mental model of this structure, but translating it into a polished document means writing transitions, ensuring logical flow, and formatting tables and frameworks consistently. This is where o11 adds the most value for senior consultants who know exactly what they want to say but would rather not spend four hours saying it.
“Structure a strategy recommendation document from these analysis notes. Include: Current State Assessment, Strategic Options (list the three options I’ve outlined), Evaluation Matrix comparing options against the four criteria I’ve identified, Recommended Approach with supporting rationale, and Implementation Considerations.”
“Build an evaluation matrix table comparing the three strategic options against these criteria: revenue impact, implementation complexity, time to value, and organizational risk. Use the assessments from my notes and format as High/Medium/Low with a brief explanation in each cell.”
o11 produces the document structure, populates the analysis sections from your notes, and builds properly formatted tables. The evaluation matrix is a real table in your Google Doc, not a text description of one. You can edit cells, adjust ratings, and add nuance without rebuilding the formatting.
For partners and principals, this means reviewing and refining a near-complete document rather than waiting for a junior team member to produce a first draft overnight.
Implementation Roadmap Documents from Project Plans
The final phase of many consulting engagements is the implementation roadmap: a detailed document that translates strategic recommendations into sequenced workstreams, milestones, ownership assignments, dependencies, and timelines. These documents are the bridge between “here is what you should do” and “here is how to actually do it.”
Roadmap documents are particularly tedious to produce because they require precise formatting: Gantt-style phase tables, RACI matrices, milestone trackers, and risk registers. The content comes from project planning discussions, but assembling it into a client-ready document is pure production work.
“Create an implementation roadmap document from these project planning notes. Structure it as: Program Overview, Workstream Descriptions (one section per workstream), Phased Timeline showing activities by quarter, RACI Matrix for key deliverables, Key Milestones and Decision Points, and Risk Register with mitigation plans.”
“Build a phased timeline table with workstreams as rows and quarters as columns. Mark each cell with the key activity for that workstream in that quarter. Add a dependencies column noting which workstreams block others.”
o11 generates the full roadmap document with formatted tables, structured sections, and content drawn directly from your planning notes. The RACI matrix is a real table you can edit. The risk register has proper columns for likelihood, impact, and mitigation. The phased timeline shows the actual activities you discussed, not placeholder text.
When the client asks for a revision, moving a workstream from Q2 to Q3 or adding a new risk, you can ask o11 to update the relevant sections rather than manually reformatting every downstream table.
Before and After: A Typical Engagement Deliverable Cycle
Before o11: A three-person consulting team finishes a four-week diagnostic engagement. They have 20 pages of interview notes, a completed analysis framework, and a clear set of recommendations. The team spends five days producing deliverables: two days on the diagnostic report, two days on the strategy document, and one day on the implementation roadmap. The associate works late three nights. The manager rewrites the executive summaries. The partner does a final review and requests structural changes that take another half-day.
After o11: The same team finishes the same engagement. The associate uses o11 to generate first drafts of all three deliverables from the interview notes and analysis outputs in a single afternoon. The manager spends a day refining the strategic reasoning and sharpening the recommendations. The partner reviews documents that are already well-structured and focused. Total deliverable production time drops from five days to two, and the quality of the final output improves because more time was spent on judgment and less on formatting.
Why o11 Instead of ChatGPT or General AI
Consultants have tried pasting interview notes into ChatGPT and asking for a diagnostic report. The output reads like a college essay: generic language, no structure, no connection to the specific evidence in your notes. You spend as much time editing the AI output as you would have spent writing from scratch.
o11 works inside Google Docs as a native layer. It reads your existing document content, understands the structure of what you are building, and produces output that integrates with what is already on the page. When you ask for an executive summary, it summarizes the actual report above it, not a generic description of what executive summaries should contain.
For consulting teams that produce dozens of client deliverables per month, the difference between an AI that generates text in a chat window and one that builds structured documents in your workspace is the difference between a novelty and a tool that actually changes how you work.
